Managing US pressure and internal divisions emerges as key test for India’s BRICS leadership

Managing US pressure and internal divisions emerges as key test for India’s BRICS leadership


As India assumes the presidency of BRICS, its most significant diplomatic challenge will be navigating mounting pressure from the United States while managing divergent strategic priorities within the bloc. With several BRICS members facing increased scrutiny from Washington, New Delhi must balance its deepening partnership with the US against its long-standing commitment to multilateralism and Global South cooperation.

According to a report published by India Narrative, India views BRICS primarily as a platform to strengthen a rules-based multilateral order and amplify the voice of developing nations. This approach, however, differs markedly from that of other key members such as Russia and China, which increasingly regard BRICS as a strategic counterweight to US dominance in global politics and finance.

India’s foreign policy, driven by pragmatic national interests, has avoided framing BRICS as an anti-Western bloc. Instead, New Delhi has consistently emphasised inclusivity, reform of global governance institutions, and constructive engagement with multiple power centres. This distinction places India in a delicate position as it seeks to lead the grouping amid intensifying geopolitical rivalries.

The report notes that India’s BRICS presidency presents an opportunity to advance the concerns of the Global South, particularly calls for fair representation in international financial institutions and greater participation in global decision-making. India has historically championed these issues, positioning itself as a bridge between developed and developing economies.

This vision was reflected in the 2025 BRICS Rio de Janeiro Declaration, which underscored inclusive growth, sustainable development, and strengthened South–South cooperation. India has further articulated its approach through the “5 Cs for the Global South”—consultation, cooperation, communication, creativity, and capacity building—aimed at fostering collective progress rather than confrontation.

Promoting multilateralism will remain central to India’s presidency. New Delhi has repeatedly stressed the need to reform global institutions to make them more equitable, effective, and accountable. India’s leadership roles in forums such as the G20, along with its development partnerships across Asia, Africa, and Latin America, reinforce its preference for engagement over bloc politics.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has described BRICS as one of India’s key strengths in promoting confidence, diversity, and multipolarity. For New Delhi, the grouping is a means to navigate a fragmented world order without being drawn into rigid alliances.

The most pressing challenge, however, lies in managing the impact of US trade measures on BRICS cohesion. The United States recently imposed tariffs of up to 50 per cent on imports from India and Brazil—the highest among BRICS members—triggering unease within the bloc. While Brazil responded with strong rhetoric and threats of retaliation, India has deliberately avoided a confrontational stance.

Instead, New Delhi has called on BRICS partners to address bilateral trade imbalances and focus on economic cooperation that benefits all members. This approach reflects India’s broader strategy of strategic autonomy—resisting pressure to choose sides while safeguarding its economic and diplomatic interests.

The report concludes that India’s ability to absorb external pressure without fracturing internal consensus will define the success of its BRICS presidency. As global power shifts accelerate, New Delhi’s challenge will be to keep BRICS relevant as a platform for cooperation rather than conflict—offering developing nations an alternative voice without turning the grouping into a tool of geopolitical rivalry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *