Anti-Indian rhetoric has surged across social media platforms in the United States amid heated debates over immigration policies, according to a recent study by the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI).

The research traced more than 24,000 posts on X in 2025 containing anti-Indian content. These posts collectively generated over 300 million views, marking a sharp increase compared to the previous year. According to the study, the volume of such content has nearly tripled since 2024.

The NCRI analysis found that the spread of anti-Indian rhetoric was not entirely organic. Instead, a relatively small number of highly active accounts appeared to drive much of the online activity. The study noted that the three most prolific accounts alone posted 525 times, generating approximately 18.4 million combined views, likes, and reposts.

These accounts accounted for more than 10 percent of the likes and roughly 20 percent of all reposts among the anti-Indian posts examined in the study, highlighting the outsized influence of a few users in amplifying such content.

Also See: Trump says US has strongest military in the world, claims global respect for America

According to a report published by the American news website The Free Press, spikes in anti-Indian rhetoric often coincided with announcements related to immigration policies during President Donald Trump’s administration.

One such instance followed the introduction of a $100,000 fee for companies sponsoring H-1B visa workers. The measure, announced through an executive order in September 2025, was aimed at addressing alleged fraud within the visa program. However, the NCRI report noted that many highly engaged posts reacting to the policy included racist language targeting Indians while praising the restrictions.

The study documented frequent use of ethnic slurs and stereotypes in discussions surrounding immigration, visas, assimilation, and employment. According to the analysis, the volume of such posts peaked in mid-December, with more than 800 posts per week containing derogatory language directed at Indians.

Public controversies have also fueled online hostility. A recent viral video showing an Indian couple performing an online dance challenge at Washington DC’s World War II Memorial sparked criticism from some social media users, who argued that the location required greater solemnity. The backlash quickly escalated into immigration-related commentary, including calls to reduce H-1B visas.

The NCRI study further noted that prominent Indian-Americans have also been targeted by online hostility. US Second Lady Usha Vance, whose parents immigrated from India, reportedly received more than 2,000 hostile posts. Vice President J D Vance publicly responded to critics defending his wife.

Other Indian-American public figures, including FBI Director Kash Patel and Justice Department Civil Rights Division head Harmeet Dhillon, were also subjected to racist online remarks.

Analysts cited by the report warn that the surge in anti-Indian rhetoric represents more than random online hostility. They argue it reflects coordinated digital amplification driven by influencers and platform algorithms, which can intensify divisive narratives.

Experts say technology companies must strengthen oversight of algorithm-driven content amplification and improve transparency regarding high-engagement posts. Policymakers, they added, should separate legitimate policy debates over immigration from ethnic targeting.

Observers note that the rise of such rhetoric could have broader consequences, potentially affecting the sense of security among immigrant communities while also undermining bipartisan goodwill toward Indian-Americans, who have played an influential role in sectors such as technology, business, and public service.

Also See: Mojtaba Khamenei injured in Tehran strike that killed father Ali Khamenei