US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington’s military campaign against Iran is progressing rapidly and could achieve its objectives “in a matter of weeks, not months,” signaling a sharp escalation in the conflict.

Speaking after meetings with G7 allies in Paris, Rubio said the US is “on or ahead of schedule” in its operations. He outlined sweeping military goals, including dismantling Iran’s naval and air capabilities and targeting its missile and drone production infrastructure.

“We are going to destroy their ability to make missiles and drones,” Rubio said, adding that the campaign also aims to significantly reduce Iran’s missile launch capacity to prevent future threats, including potential nuclear ambitions.

Rubio emphasized that these objectives would be achieved without deploying ground troops, suggesting a strategy focused on air and naval power. He added that the US is committed to “finishing the job” within weeks as progress continues.

However, he warned of potential global risks even after the operation concludes, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz—a critical oil transit route. Rubio cautioned that Iran could attempt to impose a toll system there, calling such a move “illegal” and “dangerous,” and urged the international community to prepare a coordinated response.

He stressed that countries beyond the G7, especially in Asia, have significant stakes in ensuring that vital shipping lanes remain open and free from control by any single state. While the US is ready to participate in such efforts, Rubio suggested it may not necessarily take the lead role.

Defending the broader campaign, Rubio drew a distinction between Iran’s leadership and its people, describing Iranians as deserving of better governance while accusing the country’s ruling establishment of prioritizing military expansion over national development.

“Iran was already weak,” Rubio said. “When we are done over the next couple of weeks, they will be weaker than they’ve been in recent history.”

On other global issues, Rubio reiterated Washington’s willingness to help end the Russia-Ukraine war, though he noted that no formal talks are currently scheduled. He also indicated that US military resources could be reprioritized if national security demands shift.

The remarks underscore a more assertive US posture, raising concerns about regional stability and the broader implications for global security and energy markets.